|
|
Timothy C. Hain, MD 
Page last modified:
November 9, 2008
 |
 |
| Rotatory chair with optokinetic stripes projected on the background. This particular chair was built by Micromedical Technology. | Rotatory Chair illustration from ICS, another rotatory chair vendor. |
The purpose of rotational testing is to determine whether or not dizziness may be due to a disorder of inner ear or brain, and particularly to determine whether or not both inner ears are impaired at the same time.
There are three parts to the test. The chair test measures dizziness (well jumping of the eyes really -- called nystagmus) while being turned slowly in a motorized chair (see illustrations and movie above). Persons with inner ear disease become less dizzy than do normal persons.
The optokinetic test measures dizziness caused by viewing of moving stripes (see leftward illustration above). Optokinetic testing is sometimes useful in diagnosis of bilateral vestibular loss and central conditions.
The fixation test measures nystagmus while the person is being rotated, while they are looking at a dot of light that is rotating with them. Fixation suppression is impaired by central nervous system conditions and improved by bilateral vestibular loss.
At Chicago Dizziness and Hearing we use a 100 ft-lb Neurokinetics rotatory chair system which is operated using Micromedical software. Click here for a movie of our rotatory chair in motion. Most of the illustrations on this page are taken directly from rotational chair.
Rotatory chair tests are usually obtained in addition to ENG (caloric) testing. Why get both when both test the same part of the ear (lateral semicircular canal) ? The reason is to add accuracy. ENG tests by themselves may be falsely positive or falsely negative. They can be falsely positive when wax blocks one ear canal. Rotatory chair testing is not affected by mechanical obstructions of the ear. ENG testing can be falsely negative particularly in situations where there is damage to each ear.
The author of this page has had extensive experience with the Micromedical rotatory chair system and offers rotatory chair testing in our clinic in Chicago. My opinion is that the rotatory chair is occasionally useful in diagnostic testing. Because of it's high purchase cost (typically about $100,000) and limited usefulness, it is best used in a diagnostic setting where multiple clinicians can use it, such as a hospital laboratory.
Rotatory chair testing is a type of "systems identification" -- engineers use this word to describe the process of attempting to figure out what a "black box" is doing, but giving it an known input, and measuring the the output. The ratio of the output to input is called the "transfer function". There are many reasonable protocols for the input. For a linear system, any protocol that includes a reasonable selection of frequency components should result in the same result -- a gain and time constant. As there are nonlinear processes in the vestibular system (such as prediction), the various methods may not always produce the same results. At present, most laboratories use either sinusoidal testing or step-testing.
The sinusoidal test protocol involves rotating the chair so that it moves sinusoidally. Because the derivative of a sine is another sinusoid, chair position, velocity and acceleration all change sinusoidally. Ordinarily one chooses a desired peak chair velocity, such as 60 deg/sec, and one also picks a series of frequencies to test covering about 0.1 to 1 hz. These frequencies cover the range of responses where gain and phase show their greatest variability when there is disease.
A variant of sinusoidal testing is "sum of sines" -- SOS -- one mixes together a group of sine waves to make the input less predictable. Although the SOS appears complex, it can easily be analyzed using standard mathematical methods (i.e. Fourier analysis). A "Bode plot" -- essentially a semilogarithmic plot of vestibular gain and phase, is generally used to present results. A powerful motor is needed to attain the higher frequencies, and for this reason, sometimes testing will only include lower frequencies or the peak velocity will be reduced at the highest frequency. An example of the expected output from sinusoidal test is shown below. The upper gain plot and lower phase plot depict a normal person. The lower gain plot and upper phase plot depect expected output from someone with a unilateral vestibular loss.
(figure 3)
There are several commercial devices, not incorporating motorized chairs, that provide data that overlaps in part with the data provided by rotational chairs. These devices are called "active head" devices, and compare eye movements induced by active motion of the head (rather than the passive movement induced by a motorized chair). Both of these tests measure -- the contribution of the inner ear, intentional cognitive input, and neck inputs to nystagmus rather than the contribution of the inner ear alone (Dell Santina et al, 2002).Brand names for these devices include the "Vorteq" and "VAT" among others.
 |
| Overlap between AHR device and conventional rotatory chair. |
As can easily be seen from the plot above, these devices assess the high frequency range, but do not assess the low frequency range. They are not equivalent devices to rotatory chairs because the low-frequencies are missing. Unfortunately, these devices have been associated with billing fraud. Our position on these devices is that they are simply not rotatory chairs.
If you have a rotatory chair test, there is no need to get a "VAT" or "VORTEQ" test as the information supplied is largely redundant. It is possible to have a moderate loss of vestibular function on a rotatory chair test, but have the VAT/VORTEQ test miss the diagnosis entirely. This is particularly possible in a person who has had a few years to compensate for a bilateral vestibular loss. However, if a rotatory chair test is not available, these test may have some value.
VAT tests have been used in unilateral syndromes(Perez et al. 2003), but we think that caloric testing would be superior
The step test involves suddenly changing chair velocity (with an impulse of velocity). Step responses provide roughly equivalent gain/phase information as does sinusoidal testing. Step responses have many problems. They require a powerful chair to provide a high acceleration transient. They may be less reliable as well as somewhat more stressful to the patient, and for this reason, sinusoidal testing is generally preferred. Motion sickness is sometimes associated with prolonged vestibular responses (Hoffer et al. 2003), and for this purpose, step responses may be preferable to sinusoids. Practically though, nausea is unusual in sinusoidal testing and this is not a strong consideration.
Optokinetic testing does not actually involve a rotating chair -- instead a large pattern is rotated around the subject. OKN is much less useful than is rotatory chair testing as it is rarely affected substantially by disease. Optokinetic afternystagmus (OKAN) describes the eye movements that occur after the lights are turned out for OKN, and the subject is in complete darkness. OKAN is more sensitive to disease than OKN, but it is variable in normal subjects, which again limits its usefulness.
In VVI, a person is rotated with a visual surround or target also present. The most useful variant of this is to have a person look at (fixate) a laser that is fixed to the rotatory chair. VVI is generally a good index of ones CNS's ability to suppress nystagmus, and thus it is a measure of cerebellar and brainstem function.
OVAR is obtained by tilting the axis of chair rotation with respect to the gravitational axis. OVAR is largely a test of otolith function. While this is certainly of interest, OVAR is very nauseating and for this reason has been used little in clinical settings. In our opinion, VEMP testing is a much more practical method of assessing otolith function.
Rotatory chair tests are the "gold standard" for diagnosis of bilateral vestibular loss. One expects to see the following pattern on rotatory chair testing after a process that reduces vestibular function.
|
Acute Bilateral Impairment of Vestibular Function |
Rotatory Chair Gain | Rotatory Chair Phase |
| Mild | Normal gain at all frequencies | Mild phase lead |
| Moderate | Less than 0.4 gain at 0.32 hz. | Moderate phase lead |
| Severe | 0 to 0.1 gain at all frequencies | Unobtainable |
Chronically, gain recovers at mid frequencies. A lack of recovery seen on rotatory chair testing after 2 years suggests that the test was not done properly. There are several possible reasons -- the tested individual might be taking vestibular suppressants (such as a benzodiazepine or anticholinergic), or the person might be purposefully suppressing their vestibular responses (this possibility mainly occurs in legal cases where there is a benefit to an individual in pretending to be more ill than they really are). Optokinetic afternystagmus is sensitive to bilateral vestibular loss and should be absent both acutely and chronically.
|
Chronic Bilateral Impairment of Vestibular Function |
Gain | Phase |
| Mild | Normal | Lead |
| Moderate | Less than 0.4 | Lead |
| Severe | Low normal at highest frequency (.32 hz), less than 0.1 at lower frequencies | High at high frequency |
In persons with unilateral vestibular loss, such as after a nerve section, there is also a typical pattern of rotatory chair testing in which the time constant is reduced and phase lead is increased. (Koizuka et al, 1995). See figure 3 above. Rotatory chair testing is thus a valuable adjunct to ENG testing as well as VEMP testing by confirming an abnormality. Rotatory chair testing should not be used, by itself, for unilateral vestibular loss, as it may not be accurate in determining the side of lesion.
We thank ICS, Interacoustic, and Micromedical Technology for use of figures of their equipment to illustrate this page.
Other links:
Rotatory Chair testing (emedicine site).
References:| © Copyright November 9, 2008 , Timothy C. Hain, M.D. All rights reserved. Last saved on November 9, 2008 |